Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc., No. 13-1665 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 17, 2015)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1665
Also Docketed
No. 13-1666, No. 13-1667 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 17, 2015
Judge
Hughes, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Cross-appellants Newegg, Newegg.com, Rosewill, and Sakar appeal the district court’s denial of their motion s for a declaration of an “exceptional case” under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Because we must afford the district court an opportunity to apply an intervening change in the law, we remand for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s recent clarification of the “exceptional case” standard. AdjustaCam appeals the district court’s claim construction.