Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 13-1648 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 21, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1648
Also Docketed
No. 13-1651 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 21, 2015
Judge
Reyna, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This appeal is from a final judgment entered on a jury verdict in a patent case. T he jury found the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,765,482 (“the ’482 patent”) not invalid and infringed. The jury awarded Appellee -Cross Appellant Summit 6 , LLC (“Summit”) $15 million in damages. The parties raise various issues relating to the proper legal framework for evaluating rea sonable royalty damages in the patent infringement context.