Gammino v. Sprint Communications Company, No. 13-1636 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

John R. Gammino (“Gammino”) appeals from a stip u- lated judgment of noninfringement following a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania construing claims 8 –14, 22– 28, and 35– 41 of U.S. Patent 5,809,125 (the “’125 patent”). See Gammino v. Sprint Commc’ns Co. , No. 10-2493, 2013 WL 3343661 (E.D. Pa. July 2, 2013) (claim construction o r- der); Gammino v. Sprint Commc’ns Co., No. 10-2493, ECF No. 161 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2013) (stipulated judgment).