Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

ScriptPro, LLC v. Innovation Associates, No. 13-1561 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2014)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1561
Decided
August 6, 2014
Judge
Taranto, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs ScriptPro, LLC and ScriptPro USA, Inc. (collectively, ScriptPro) sued Innovation Associates, Inc , alleging infringement of claims 1, 2, 4, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,910,601. The district court granted su m- mary judgment for Innovation Associates, hold ing that the asserted claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 (now § 112 (a)), which requires, for a claim to be valid, that the patent’s specification describe the subject matter defined by the claim.