Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Hemphill v. Johnson & Johnson, No. 13-1503 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1503
Decided
January 14, 2014
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

HEMPHILL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2 Allegra Hemphill appeals from two decisions of the United States District Court for the District of C o- lumbia. The district court denied Hemphill’s Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), in which she sought to have the court set aside its January 2013 order dismissing Hemphill’s complaint for failure to state a claim.