Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation, No. 13-1450 (Fed. Cir. June 27, 2014)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1450
Decided
June 27, 2014
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Hill-Rom Services, Inc ., Hill-Rom Company, Inc. , and Hill-Rom Manufacturing, Inc. ( collectively, Hill-Rom) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judg- ment that Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corp o- ration ( collectively, Str yker) do not infringe asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,699,038 (’038 patent) , 6,147,592 (’592 patent), and 7,538,659 (’659 patent) . Because the district court’s judgment of non -infringement was premised on erroneous claim construction s, we re- verse and remand.