Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLC, No. 13-1437 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1437
Decided
April 9, 2014
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The U nited States District Court for the District of Montana denied plaintiff -appellant Trebro Manufactu r- ing, Inc.’s (Trebro) motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants -appellees FireFly Equipment, LLC and Steven R. Aposhian (collectively, FireFly) for i n- fringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,336,638 (the ’638 patent). Trebro Mfg., Inc. v. FireF ly Equip., LLC, No. 13-CV-0036, 2013 WL 1655993 (D. Mont. Apr. 17, 2013) ( Order).