Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. v. Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, No. 13-1406 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 20, 2014)

Reversed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1406
Decided
February 20, 2014
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Cadila Healthcare Limited (“appellants” or “Zydus”) appeal f rom a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey finding that appellants had infringed claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,328,994 (“’994 patent”) and had failed to establish that it was invalid. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the district court’s finding of infringement, but affirm its ruling on invalidity.