Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., No. 13-1324 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 4, 2014)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1324
Decided
December 4, 2014
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Ethicon Endo -Surgery, Inc. appeals from a U.S. District Court for t he District of Connecticut judgment that certain asserted claims of Tyco Healthcare Group LP’s U.S. Patent Nos. 6,68 2,544 (“’544 patent”), 6,063,050 (“’050 patent”) , and 6,468,286 (“’286 patent”) would not have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Tyco cross - appeals from the district court’s conclusion that the other asserted claims are anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g).