Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL Inc., No. 13-1307 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2014)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1307
Also Docketed
No. 13-1313 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 15, 2014
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
37 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”) brought an acti on against AOL Inc., Google Inc. (“Google”), IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., and Target Corpor a- tion (collectively, the “Google Defendants”) alleging i n- fringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,314,420 (the “’420 patent”) and 6,775,664 (the “’664 pa tent”). A jury r e- turned a verdict finding that all asserted claims were infringed and not anticipated. J.A. 4163 -73. The district court then determined that the asserted claims were not obvious and entered judgment in I/P Engine’s favor.