Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc., No. 13-1245 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2014)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1245
Decided
June 10, 2014
Judge
Prost, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
41 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp., Sandoz, Inc., Hit -Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Watson Pharma, Inc. (collectively “appellants”) appeal from a final judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina finding that appe l- lants had infringed claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,388,029 (“’029 patent”) and 7,351,404 (“’404 patent”) and had failed to establish they were invalid. F or the reasons stated below, we reverse the district court’s findings with respect to the validity of each patent.