Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

InTouch Technologies, Inc. v. VGo Communications, Inc., No. 13-1201 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2014)

Affirmed in Part
Non-Infringement Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103) Summary Judgment JMOL / Post-Trial
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1201
Decided
May 9, 2014
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
48 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The world has come a long way; this is a patent case about robots. InTouch Technologies, Inc. d/b/a InTouch Health (“InTouch”) and VGo Communications, Inc. (“VGo”) both manufacture remo te telepresence robot systems. In 2012 , InTouch filed a First Amended C om- plaint in the Central District of California alle ging that VGo’s remote telepresence robot system in fringed several of its patents, including U.S. Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error