Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation, No. 13-1193 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 26, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This appeal arises from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Sidense Corporation (“Sidense”), holding that it did not infringe Kilopass Technology, Inc.’s (“Kilopass ’s”) U.S. Patents 6,940,751 ( “the ’751 patent”), 6 ,777,757, and 6,856,540. Kilopass Tech., Inc. v. Sidense Corp. , No. 10 -2066, 2012 WL 3545286 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2012). We summarily affirmed that decision under Federal Circuit Rule 36 . Kilopass Tech., Inc. v. Sidense Corp., 501 F.