Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, No. 13-1180 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1180
Decided
July 10, 2014
Judge
Schall, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pro se p laintiff-appellant Raymond E. Stauffer brought this qui tam action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2008. 1 In his suit, Mr. Stauffer sued defendant -appellee Brooks Brothers, Inc. (“Brooks Brothers”) under the then- extant version of the false- marking statute , 35 U.S.C. § 292 (2006).2 Mr. Stauffer alleged that Brooks Brothers violat- ed the statute by marking its bow ties with expired patent numbers. In 2011, while Mr.