Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Exelixis, Inc. v. Lee, No. 13-1175 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1175
Decided
January 15, 2014
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Exelixis, Inc. , filed suits in the Eastern District of Virginia that challenged the determination by the Patent and Trademark Office of how much time to add, under 35 U.S.C. § 154(b), to the otherwise- applicable term s of two patents: U.S. Patent Nos . 8,067,436 and 7,989,622. Exelixis, Inc. v. Kappos, 919 F. Supp. 2d 689 (E.D. Va. 2013) (the ’436 patent suit); Exelixis, Inc. v. Kappos, 906 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D. Va. 2012) (the ’622 patent suit ).