Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Augme Technologies, Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc., No. 13-1121 (Fed. Cir. June 20, 2014)

Affirmed
Non-Infringement Infringement Indefiniteness Doctrine of Equivalents
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1121
Decided
June 20, 2014
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Augme Technologies, Inc. (Augme) sued Yahoo! Inc. (Yahoo!) alleging infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,594,691 and 7,269,636 (collectively, the Augme patents), and Yahoo! counterclaimed that Augme and World Talk Radio, LLC (collectively, Appellants) infringed certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,6 40,320. After claim construction, the court granted Yahoo! su m- mary judgment of noninfringement. The district court also entered judgment that certain means -plus-function terms in claims 19 and 20 of Augme’s ’691 patent were indefinite.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error