Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Medtronic Corevalve, LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp., No. 13-1117 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 22, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1117
Decided
January 22, 2014
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Medtronic CoreValve, LLC, the assignee of U.S. P a- tent No. 7,892,281 (“’281 patent”), appeals from the jud g- ment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc. (collectively, “E d- wards”) of invalidity of c ertain claims of the ’281 patent. The judgment rests on the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment that the ’281 patent is limited to a priority date of no earlier than April 10, 2003 .