Neurorepair, Inc. v. Nath Law Group, No. 13-1073 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The question before this court is whether a California state court malpractice case involving patent law repre- sentation was properly removed to a federal court. Under the principles of Gunn v. Minton , 133 S. Ct. 1059 (2013) , it was not. Plaintiff-appellant NeuroRepair, Inc. (“ NeuroRepair”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States Di s- trict Court for the Southern District of California granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants - appellees The Nath Law Group and Robert P.