Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Keurig, Incorporated v. Sturm Foods, Inc., No. 13-1072 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1072
Decided
October 17, 2013
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Keurig, Inc. (“Keurig”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Del a- ware granting summary judgment that Sturm Foods, Inc. (“Sturm”) does not infringe claim 29 of Keurig’s U.S. Patent 7,165,488 (the “’488 patent”) and claims 6– 8 of Keurig’s U.S. Patent 6,606,938 (the “’938 patent”). Keurig, Inc. v. Sturm Foods, Inc. , No. 10 -841, 2012 WL 4049799 (D. Del. Sept. 13, 2012).