Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ncube Corporation v. SeaChange International Inc., No. 13-1066 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1066
Decided
October 10, 2013
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On July 31, 2009, ARRIS Group, Inc. (“ARRIS”) 1 filed a motion to hold SeaChange International Inc. (“SeaChange”) in contempt of a permanent injunction order. The United States District Court for the District of Delaware found that ARRIS failed to meet its burden of showing contempt by clear and convincing evidence and declined to hold SeaChange in contempt. ARRIS appeals. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the contempt motion, we affirm. I ARRIS and SeaChange are providers of video -on- demand products and services.