Lee v. Mike's Novelties, No. 13-1049 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 21, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ ANTHONY H. HANDAL, Handal & Morofsky , LLC, of Fairfield, Connecticut, argued for plaintiff-appellee. L OUIS F. TERAN, SLC Law Group, of Pasadena, Cal i- fornia, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________ LEE v. MIKE'S NOVELTIES 2 Before DYK, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. DYK, Circuit Judge Defendants Mike’s Novelties, Inc. , d.b.a. Mike’s Worldwide Imports and Manisch Chander (collectively “MWI”) appeal a judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.