Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Galderma Laboratories, L.P. v. Tolmar, Inc., No. 13-1034 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1034
Decided
December 11, 2013
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
34 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent infringement case, Tolmar, Inc. cha l- lenges the district court’s holding that the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,579,377 ( ’377 patent) ; 7,737,181 ( ’181 patent); 7,834,060 ( ’060 patent) ; 7,838,558 ( ’558 patent) ; and 7,868,044 (’044 patent), which are owned by Galde r- ma Laboratories, L.P., Galderma S.A., and Galderma Research and Development, S.N.C. (collectively, “ Galder- ma”) are not invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We find that the district court erred in finding the claims of the assert- ed patents not invalid as obvious.