Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Apotex Inc., No. 13-1027 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 31, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1027
Decided
March 31, 2014
Judge
Plager, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
25 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This is a patent case calling on us to consider the ap- plication of claim preclusion doctrine (res judicata ) to a second suit on the same patent based on a mended claims resulting from a re-examination of the patent. Plaintiffs- Appellants Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kyorin Phar- maceutical Co., Ltd., and Allergan, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Senju”) filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against De- fendants-Appellees Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. (“Apo- tex”).