Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

August Technology Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd., No. 12-1681 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2013)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1681
Decided
November 18, 2013
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

August Technology Corporation and Rudolph Tec h- nologies, Inc. (collectively, “August Tech”) filed suit against Camtek , Ltd. (“ Camtek”) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, alleging that Camtek infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,826,298 (“the ’298 patent”). August Tech is the assignee of the ’ 298 patent, which is directed to an automated semiconductor wafer inspection system. Camtek counterc laimed for declarat o- ry judgment of noninfringement and invalidity.