Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Intellect Wireless, Inc. v. HTC Corporation, No. 12-1658 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1658
Decided
October 9, 2013
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Intellect Wireless, Inc. (Intellect) appeals from the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patent Nos. 7,266,186 (’186 patent) and 7,310,416 (’416 patent) are unenforce a- ble due to inequitable conduct. We affirm. BACKGROUND The technology at issue in this case involves wireless transmission of caller identification (ID) information. The asserted patents share the same specification, which discloses providing caller ID information from a message center to a personal communication device, such as a cell phone, via a wireless network.