Buckhorn Inc. v. Orbis Corporation, No. 12-1643 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 19, 2013)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Defendant ORBIS Corporation (“ORBIS”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Sout h- ern District of Ohio denying its motion for fees, costs, reasonable attorney fees, and expenses . In denying the motion, t he district court found th at a settlement and license agreement’s fee provision did not apply when Plaintiffs allegedly had “no knowledge of the [settlement and license agreement] at the time the litigation was initiated.” Further, the district court stated that it would be unconscion…
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error