Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Wawrzynski v. H.J. Heinz Company, No. 12-1624 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 6, 2013)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1624
Decided
September 6, 2013
Judge
Plager, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This is or is not a patent case, depending on one’s time frame. It came to us on appeal from a District Court summary judgment that the plaintiff had failed to prove infringement of his patent. I t leaves us as a transfer to the applicable regional circuit on the ground that plai n- tiff’s case from the beginning was not a patent infring e- ment case. In the case as it came to us, David Wawrzynski ap- peals two rulings from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania , each granting summary judgment in favor of H.J.