Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ceats, Inc. v. Continental Airlines, Inc., No. 12-1614 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 26, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1614
Decided
April 26, 2013
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case involves four patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,454,361 (the ’361 patent); 7,548,866 (the ’866 patent); 7,660,728 (the ’728 patent); and 7,548,869 (the ’869 p a- tent). The late r three patents are continuations of the ’361 patent and generally claim “electronic means by which people can select the exact seat or seats they want” for events, venues, or on airplanes over the internet. See ’361 patent, Abstract, col. 2, ll. 37–49.