Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Integrated Technology Corp. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc., No. 12-1593 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 4, 2013)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1593
Also Docketed
No. 12-1618 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
November 4, 2013
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (Rudolph) appeals from the district court’s judgment that it i nfringes U.S. Patent No. 6,118,894 (’894 patent ). Rudolph challenges the court’s denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law ( JMOL) that prosecution history estoppel bars the application of the doctrine of equiva lents. Rudolph also challenges the award of damages, the court’s determin a- tion that this was an exceptional case under 35 U.S.C. § 285, and that Rudolph failed to prove laches.