Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, No. 12-1575 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2014)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1575
Decided
April 10, 2014
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
39 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education d/b/a/ Universi ty of Pitts- burgh (“Pitt”) filed suit against Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“Varian”), alleging infringement of various claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,727,554 (“the ’554 patent”). After construing numerous terms of the ’554 patent, the district court entered partial summary judgment in favor of Pitt, finding that Varian’s accused products infringe the a s- serted claims of the ’554 patent as a matter of law .