Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., No. 12-1548 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 25, 2014)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1548
Decided
April 25, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
95 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

______________________ E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, Orrick, Herrington & Su t- cliffe LLP, of New York, New York , argued for plaintiffs - ppellants. With him on the brief were M ARK S. DAVIES, RACHEL M. MCKENZIE and T. VANN PEARCE, JR. of Wash- ington, DC; and MATTHEW D. POWERS, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, of Redwood Shores, California. Of counsel was KATHERINE M. KOPP, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC. APPLE INC. v. MOTOROLA, INC. 2 DAVID A. NELSON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sull i- van, LLP, argued for d efendants-cross appellants.