Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., No. 12-1531 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2013)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1531
Decided
August 9, 2013
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Aria Diagnostics, Inc., now known as Ariosa Diagno s- tics, Inc. (Ariosa ) sought a declaration that its Harmony test did not infringe any claim of U.S. Patent No. 6,258,540 (the ’ 540 patent), owned by defendant Isis Innovation Limited (Isis) and licensed by Isis exclusively to Sequenom, Inc. (Sequenom) . Sequenom counter- claimed, alleging that Ariosa’s Harmony test infringes the ’540 patent.