Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

MeadWestvaco Corporation v. Rexam Beauty, No. 12-1518 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 26, 2013)

Affirmed in Part
Claim Construction Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103) Infringement
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1518
Decided
September 26, 2013
Judge
Prost, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc . and Rexam Di s- pensing Systems S .A.S. (collectively “Rexam”) and Valois of America, Inc. and Valois S .A.S. (collectively “Valois”) appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia based on: (1) the construction of several terms in U.S. Patent Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error