Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Pronova BioPharma Norge v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, No. 12-1498 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 12, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1498
Also Docketed
No. 12-1499 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 12, 2013
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This patent infringement suit arises from Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”) filed by Teva Pharm a- ceuticals USA Inc. (“Teva”) and Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. (collectively “Par”) (with Teva, collectively “ Appellants”). Through their ANDAs, Appellants seek to market generic versions of Lovaza®, a pharmaceutical product marketed by Plai n- tiff Pronova BioPharma Norge AS (“Pronova”). Following a bench trial, the U.S.