Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Applied Medical Resources v. Tyco Healthcare Group, No. 12-1412 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 27, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1412
Decided
August 27, 2013
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Applied Medical Resources Corporation (“Applied”) appeals from the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Applied sued Tyco Healthcare Group LP, doing business as C ovidien (“Covidien”), for infringement of U.S. Patent No. RE 42,379 (’379 patent ). The district court addressed claim construction, infringement, and validity together, granting summary judgment that the ’379 patent was not infringed and denying summary judgment that the patent was invalid.