Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc., No. 12-1355 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 2013)

Reversed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1355
Decided
July 31, 2013
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent infringement case, Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics”) filed suit alleging that Aliph , Inc. and Aliphcom, Inc.’s (collectively, “Aliph”) products infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,712,453, entitled “Concha Headset Stabilizer” (the “’453 patent”). On March 23, 2012, the district court granted-in-part Aliph’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement and invalidity, construing certain disputed terms, finding in relevant part that the accused products do not infringe claims 1 and 10, and holding the asserted claims invalid as obvious.