Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc., No. 12-1289 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 26, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1289
Decided
April 26, 2013
Judge
Wallach, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
27 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Biosig Instruments, Inc. (“ Biosig”) is the assignee of U.S. Patent No. 5,337,753 ( “the ’753 patent”), which is directed to a heart rate monitor associated with an exer- cise apparatus and/or exercise procedures. Biosig brought a patent infringement action against Nautilus, Inc. (“Nautilus”) in district court alleging that Nautilus in- fringed claims 1 and 11 of the ’753 patent. After claim construction, Nautilus filed a motion for summary judg- ment seeking, in relevant port ion, to have the ’753 patent held invalid for indefiniteness.