Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Capital Machine Company, Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc., No. 12-1288 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 15, 2013)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1288
Decided
April 15, 2013
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Capital Machine Co mpany, Inc. , et al. (Capital) ap- peal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Miller Veneers, Inc., et al. (Miller) do not infringe the asserted claims of Capital’s pate nts: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,562,137, 5,694,995, 5,701,938, 5,678,619, 5,819,828, and 7,395,843. Because the court incorrectly construed some claim terms, we vacate its grant of summary judgment and remand. I.