Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC, No. 12-1276 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1276
Decided
January 24, 2013
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant-Appellant Earvana, LLC (“Earvana”) appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California hol d- ing U.S. Patent 6,433,264 (the “’264 patent”), assigned to Plaintiff-Appellee Ernie Ball, Inc. (“Ernie Ball”), valid and enforceable and holding Earvana liable for infringement. Ernie Ball, Inc. v. Earvana, LLC , No. 5:06-cv-00384-JHN- OPx, 2011 WL 201816, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5831 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011).