Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Apotex Inc., No. 12-1270 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1270
Also Docketed
No. 12-1271, No. 12-1272 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
October 11, 2012
Judge
Lourie, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. ("Roche") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Dis­ trict of New Jersey, denying Roche's motion for a prelimi­ nary injunction. See Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. u. Apotex Inc., No. 2:07-CV-04417, 2012 WL 869572 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2012) ("Preliminary Injunction Order"). Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Roche's request for a preliminary injunction, we affirm. BACKGROUND I. This patent appeal relates to methods of treating os­ teoporosis in post-menopausal women.