Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Regents of Univ. of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corporation, No. 12-1167 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1167
Decided
June 3, 2013
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellant Regents of the University of Minnesota (“the University”) owns U.S. Patent No. 6,077,281 ( “the ’281 patent ”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,077,291 ( “the ’291 patent”), which are directed to medical devices for repai r- ing heart defects. The University accused AGA Medical Corporation (“AGA”) of infringing both patents. After claim construction, the district court granted summary judgment that the ’291 patent was not infringed and that the asserted claims of the ’281 pate nt were invalid as anticipated.