Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International, No. 11-1572 (Fed. Cir. May 14, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1572
Decided
May 14, 2013
Judge
Dyk, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Appellants Powerscreen International Distribution, Ltd., Powerscreen New York, Inc., and Emerald Equi p- ment Systems, Inc. (collectively “Powerscreen”), and Terex Corporation (“Terex”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. That judgment was based on a jury verdict that Powerscreen had infringed U. S. Patent No. 5,577,618 (“the ’618 Patent”) owned by appellee Metso Minerals, Inc. (“Metso”), and its findin g that the asserted claims would not have been obvious.