Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., No. 09-1372 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2012)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 09-1372
Also Docketed
No. 09-1380, No. 09-1416, No. 09-1417, No. 10-1291 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
August 31, 2012
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
103 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

When a single actor commits all the elements of in- fringement, that actor is liable for direct infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a). Wh en a single actor induces another actor to commit all the elements of infringement, the first actor is liable for induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). But when the acts necessary to give rise to liability for direct infringement are shared between two or more actors, doctrinal proble ms arise.