Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Fed. Cir.

Taurus IP v. Daimlerchrysler, No. 08-1462 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2013)

Affirmed in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 08-1462
Decided
August 9, 2013
Judge
Schall, J.
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
67 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

These appeals come to us from the United States Di s- trict Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. There, in two separate actions, Taurus IP, LLC (“Taurus”) sued various defendants, alleging that their external websites infringed independent claim 16, as well as dependent claims 19, 22, 23, and 27, of Taurus’s U.S. Patent No. 6,141,658 (the “ ’658 patent”). The ’ 658 patent generally relates to “a computer system for managing product knowledge related to products offered for sale by a selling entity.” ’658 patent col. 2 ll. 52–54.