Motion to Strike
A motion to strike asks the court to remove material from the record or to bar a party from relying on it. In patent litigation the most common targets are expert reports that exceed the scope of a party's contentions, infringement or invalidity theories disclosed after the deadline for them, and evidence produced too late for the other side to meet. Because patent cases run on detailed contention deadlines, striking an untimely theory can remove an issue from the case entirely, and courts weigh the prejudice to the opposing party against the importance of the material and the availability of a cure. The opinions here include grants, denials, and partial strikes.
414 opinions and orders, showing 401–414.
- April 7, 2008 E.D. Tex. MacLean-Fogg Company v. Eaton Corporation, No. 2:07-cv-00472 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2008) Denied
- December 13, 2007 E.D. Tex. Freescale Semiconductor Inc v. Promos Technologies, No. 4:06-cv-00491 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2007) Granted in Part
- December 5, 2007 E.D. Tex. Freescale Semiconductor Inc v. Promos Technologies, No. 4:06-cv-00491 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 5, 2007) Granted in Part
- October 11, 2007 E.D. Tex. Power-One, Inc., v. artesyn Technologies, Inc.,, No. 2:05-cv-00463 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 11, 2007) Denied
- August 24, 2007 E.D. Tex. Computer acceleration Corporation v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 9:06-cv-00140 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2007) Granted
- March 21, 2007 E.D. Tex. 02 Micro Int'l v. Beyond Innovation, et al, No. 2:04-cv-00032 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 21, 2007) Granted in Part
- November 20, 2006 E.D. Tex. Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc v. D-Link Corporation et al, No. 6:05-cv-00291 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2006) Claims Construed
- July 6, 2006 E.D. Tex. Connectel, LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00396 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2006) Granted in Part
- May 5, 2006 E.D. Tex. Sensormatic Electronics Corportation v. W G Security Products, Inc et al, No. 2:04-cv-00167 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 2006) Granted in Part
- May 2, 2006 E.D. Tex. Finisar Corporation v. DirecTV Group Inc The et al, No. 1:05-cv-00264 (E.D. Tex. May 2, 2006) Granted
- April 12, 2006 Fed. Cir. Patriot Scientific Corp. v. Moore, No. 05-1452 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2006) Affirmed in Part
- January 6, 2006 E.D. Tex. Yasuo Kamatani, et al v. Benq Inc, No. 2:03-cv-00437 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2006) Denied
- November 1, 2005 E.D. Tex. Tantivy Communications Inc v. Lucent Technologies Inc, No. 2:04-cv-00079 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2005) Granted in Part
- October 28, 2004 Fed. Cir. Caterpillar v. Sturman Indus., No. 03-1444 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 28, 2004) Reversed in Part